Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Tank - Panzer IV AusF H by mjranum-stock Tank - Panzer IV AusF H by mjranum-stock
Stock image - model tank.

For usage restrictions please see the journal entries on my main page: [link]
Add a Comment:
 
:iconretosaluz:
RetoSaluz Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2015  New Deviant
hello 

i used your stock here

Basterds

Thank you
Reply
:iconretosaluz:
RetoSaluz Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2015  New Deviant
hello 

i used your stock here

Basterds

Thank you
Reply
:icondeadhedgehog:
DeadHedgehog Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2015  Student General Artist
This is no ausf H. It looks more like an Ausf. D with skirts on the tower. The ausf H and J both have different bodies. There are 2 Panzer IVs with that body Panzer IV Ausf. A and Panzer IV ausf. D and this looks more like an ausf. D with skirts attached.
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
1. That is a turret, not a "tower".
2. Those are not "skirts", Skirts are only found on the hull of the vehicle (just call them spaced armour)
3. Models H and J had the same hull, Ausf. H had the side skirts and the spaced armour for the turret, Ausf. J had no skirts.
4. We cannot assume that this is an Ausf. D since the D variant had a two piece hatch for the commander. The one here is a one piece hatch found on the Ausf. H and Ausf. J
5. We cannot assume that we are both correct nor incorrect. German tank developments were not completely documented and field modifications undertaken by crew or field mechanics are not documented as well. So we do not have a clear idea as to what variant of the Panzerkampfwagen IV this is as the information and the model shown are contradictory.
6. It can be generally assumed that this Panzer IV is a late war command tank but with the surplus of kwk37 cannons they were easier to fit than the other guns such as the kwk40 and kwk48.
7. However, the model contradicts point no. 6 as there are no visible radio antenna such as those found on German command tanks of the time (similar to the Tiger's star antenna on their command vehicles)
8. An odd note is that the commander's cupola has no fitting for the five standard vision ports for the commander to direct the driver.
9. It can be assumed for sure that this vehicle must have been an early war vehicle fitted with the turret spaced armour. And that the single piece hatch was a replacement for the two piece hatch used on earlier vehicles.
Reply
:icondeadhedgehog:
DeadHedgehog Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2015  Student General Artist
1. seriously that is your first point?
2. I'm sorry but in Germany (you know where the tank was build and named) those things are called 'schürzen' which means skirts, so no those are skirts.
3.i think i made a spelling mistake there H and J had similar hulls; Wether a tank had skirts or not wasn't essential for the naming some ausf. H had none and some ausf J had skirts (www.militaryimages.net/photopo…) the skirts are an attachment which was sometimes build on older tank retroactivly.
4.We can assume it's an Ausf J because that is the hull for one it has the the ledged front of a ausf. furthermore we don't see the hatch so i assume that either it's closed, it's not the correct hatch or that it's not the correct tower ...
5. Changing a tower is not really a field modification, because that is clearly an ausf D body
6.A commander tank would have special radio equipment noticable by a star antenna
7.see point 6 (if you contradicted yourself why did you write both of it? to have more points?)
8.valid point but also there is no driver viewport
9.i don't know how you can 'assume this for sure' i just like to believe that this is not a correct model
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Edited Jun 8, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
Yes, I'm mocking you in No.1 because you called the turret the tower (I will always be laughing at this). You probably can't see the hatch clearly is mainly because of the MG mounting on the Cupola. Haha. See those two tiny dots above the drivers view port? we both know that those are for his periscope, so why say that there is no drivers view port (I know it's not clearly marked between those two plated by a small indent or slit)? I mentioned star antenna at the end of No.6.

I never said that I was correct. I just assume based on the image given to me.
Reply
:icondeadhedgehog:
DeadHedgehog Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2015  Student General Artist
really, your main argument point is a specification mistake that is only present in english and yes i get that i'm speaking english jadijadijada but seriously? You start your first point with the fact that i used a synonym incorrectly?
And when i sai dthat there was no viewport i meant the obvious fact that the view port holes don't go all the way through x-x
and my point stil stands you brought up a point jsut to negate it in the next sentece which is really redundant and you only made your argument look longer.
And I'm sorry but the phrase 'It can be assumed for sure' means that you ARE sure because.
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
yeah so? you got a problem with that.

--->Lets be mature. Argument ends here<---
Reply
:icondeadhedgehog:
DeadHedgehog Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  Student General Artist
well that wasn't a waste of time or anything
Reply
:iconwellthatsawkward:
wellthatsawkward Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Look at the protrusion of the optics. It's a D that has spaced armour for whatever reason.
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
What protrusion? The commander's hatch? The turret?
Reply
:iconwellthatsawkward:
wellthatsawkward Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Read my comment again. I said the protrusion of the optics. Next to the machine gun port.
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
You should have said Protrusion in the hull for the Driver's compartment.
Reply
:iconwellthatsawkward:
wellthatsawkward Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I think I made myself pretty clear. So do you agree with me?
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
For whatever reason, this is not a correct model of the Panzerkampfwagen IV
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icondeadhedgehog:
DeadHedgehog Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2015  Student General Artist
the ledged hull at the front H AND J bo not have that
Reply
:iconignatiusaxonn:
IgnatiusAxonn Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2015  New Deviant Hobbyist Artist
wow no shit
Reply
:iconthestorminsideme:
TheStormInsideMe Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Reply
:icongiocamacho:
GioCamacho Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2014  Professional Photographer
Thanks used it here...giocamacho.deviantart.com/art/…
Reply
:iconrahashif:
RAHASHIF Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
rahashif.deviantart.com/art/In…

Used it here ..!

Thank you so much!!
Reply
:iconcharliebrown1745:
CharlieBrown1745 Featured By Owner May 19, 2014
Excellent work!
Reply
:iconeinstein64k:
einstein64k Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2013   Digital Artist
Reply
:icondarkandlost:
darkandlost Featured By Owner Sep 25, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Reply
:icontravellerplanet:
travellerplanet Featured By Owner Jul 12, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I have used your stock here [link]
Thanks :)
Reply
:iconevertrey:
EverTrey Featured By Owner Jun 16, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
used your stock.[link]
thanks...
:woohoo:
Reply
:iconbg80018:
bg80018 Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thanks nice stock!!
[link]
Reply
:iconetutz08:
etutz08 Featured By Owner May 10, 2013
Thanks! I used this on my blog's new series titled 'Toy Project:Iron Man' :)
Reply
:icongolphee:
Golphee Featured By Owner Jan 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Many thanks. Used here: [link]
Reply
:iconunknown-designer092:
UnKnown-Designer092 Featured By Owner Nov 19, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Used here : [link]
Reply
:iconlukeazade:
lukeazade Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2012  Student Digital Artist
used here thanks [link]
Reply
:iconadlibitium:
AdLibitium Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2012
I used this image here [link]
Reply
:iconbudie12:
budie12 Featured By Owner Oct 26, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
i used it here.. [link] great stock:)
Reply
:iconemdesignemd:
EmDesignEmd Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Professional Interface Designer
USED HERE [link] MUCH THNX :D
Reply
:iconoffermoord:
offermoord Featured By Owner Jun 16, 2012
Hi, I used your tank [link] Thanks for the great stock!
Reply
:iconrafaelll90:
Rafaelll90 Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Reply
:iconenc86:
enc86 Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2012
wow, fantastic panzer.looks great!
Reply
:iconbonafidechimp:
BonaFideChimp Featured By Owner Apr 14, 2012  Professional General Artist
I used your stock image here: [link]
Thanks =)
Reply
:iconofg-arts:
ofg-arts Featured By Owner Feb 3, 2012
used this image here: [link]
Reply
:iconpanzerschreckleopard:
It's still incorrectly titled
Reply
:icon12jack12:
12jack12 Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Looking good :nod:
Reply
:iconlorrainer:
lorrainer Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2011  Student Digital Artist
:iconhelloplz: used here [link] tnx :wormnomnom:
Reply
:iconblindman987:
blindman987 Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2011
Used here : [link]
Thanks for providing! :)
Reply
:iconleebaneo:
Leebaneo Featured By Owner May 13, 2011
Thanks so much man!!! ;)
Reply
:iconnoshouting:
noshouting Featured By Owner Apr 15, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Used here: [link]
Reply
:iconkyriod:
Kyriod Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2011
Last thing I expect in your gallery is surprisingly the first thing submitted as far as your gallery shows. xD
Reply
:iconmohammedradhi:
Mohammedradhi Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2011
Used here
[link]

Thank u very much :hug:
Reply
:iconjawoltze:
jawoltze Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2010
used this wonderful stock.. here is the [link] thank you !
Reply
:iconiamgonnagrowwings:
IAmGonnaGrowWings Featured By Owner Oct 9, 2010
[link] Thanks
Maybe you could think the image is insulting towards your stock, if it's the case just tell and I'll remove it from dA.
Reply
:iconnightraven1:
NightRaven1 Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2010  Hobbyist Artisan Crafter
nice model !
Reply
:iconjasime-gyspy:
jasime-gyspy Featured By Owner May 31, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
used here [link]
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×
Download JPG 4048 × 2550




Details

Submitted on
March 20, 2007
Image Size
764 KB
Resolution
4048×2550
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
25,945 (9 today)
Favourites
251 (who?)
Comments
75
Downloads
7,953 (1 today)

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
×